top of page
Writer's pictureManan Sethi

The Middle Corridor: China's Belt and Road Initiative's Vital Pathway to Global Connectivity

Unlocking New Opportunities: The Rising Significance of China's Middle Corridor in Bypassing Russia, Navigating Sanctioned Iran, and Overcoming Instabilities in Pakistan


The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched by China in 2013, represents one of modern history's most ambitious and extensive infrastructure and economic development projects. Inspired by the ancient Silk Road trading routes, the BRI aims to enhance connectivity and foster economic cooperation between Asia, Europe, Africa, and beyond. With its dual components, the land-based "Belt" and the maritime "Road," the initiative seeks to create a vast transportation, energy, and telecommunications infrastructure network. This initiative goes beyond traditional infrastructure development and envisions promoting trade, investment, and cultural exchanges, thereby facilitating regional integration and shared prosperity. Its core goals include enhancing trade connectivity, promoting financial cooperation, boosting infrastructure development, facilitating policy coordination, and fostering people-to-people bonds. By fostering economic linkages and strengthening regional cooperation, the BRI aspires to unlock new growth opportunities and address developmental gaps, all while promoting a vision of shared benefits and mutual understanding among participating countries.


BELT AND ROAD- THE BRAINCHILD OF CHINA'S GLOBAL AMBITIONS

China's perspective on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a means to potentially reshape the world order and support its rise as a global superpower can be understood through several factors.

  1. First and foremost, China aims to diversify its economic and geopolitical influence beyond its borders, reducing its dependence on the existing US-led world order. By developing extensive infrastructure networks, trade routes, and economic partnerships through the BRI, China seeks to enhance its connectivity with countries around the world, thereby expanding its economic and political reach.

  2. China perceives the BRI as a platform that offers an alternative to the established Western-dominated trade organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank. These organizations have traditionally been led by the United States and its allies, shaping global economic rules and norms. China believes that by fostering regional economic integration through the BRI, it can challenge the existing order and exert greater influence in shaping international trade and financial frameworks.

  3. Additionally, the BRI is seen by China as a strategic tool to strengthen its position as a global superpower. Through investments in infrastructure, energy projects, and economic cooperation, China can enhance its soft power and diplomatic influence. By positioning itself as a reliable partner in providing economic development opportunities to participating countries, China aims to cultivate stronger bilateral relations, gain geopolitical leverage, and potentially shape the balance of power in its favour.


It is important to note that while China sees the BRI as a vehicle for expanding its influence and challenging the existing world order, the initiative is also presented as a cooperative endeavour that promotes win-win outcomes and shared benefits. China emphasizes the principle of mutual respect, non-interference, and inclusive development, highlighting its intention to collaborate with countries around the world rather than impose its own ideology or political system.


COUNTRIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) encompasses a wide range of countries across Asia, Europe, Africa, and even parts of the Americas. While the specific countries involved may vary depending on the source and interpretation of the BRI, here are some examples of countries commonly associated with the initiative:

  1. China (The initiator and primary driver of the BRI)

  2. Central Asian countries: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan

  3. South Asian countries: Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Maldives

  4. Southeast Asian countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Philippines

  5. Middle Eastern countries: Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Oman, Jordan, and Turkey

  6. European countries: Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Poland, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Portugal

  7. African countries: Kenya, Ethiopia, Egypt, Tanzania, Nigeria, South Africa, Morocco, and Djibouti

  8. Latin American countries: Argentina, Chile, Brazil, and Peru

From the resources of Africa, the Middle East and Latin America to the key seaports of South Asia, the land routes of central Asia to the markets of Europe and South East Asia, China seeks to spread its influence in every region through this initiative.

WHY IS THE MIDDLE CORRIDOR OF THE BRI GAINING TRACTION The Middle Corridor of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is gaining increasing importance due to a combination of geopolitical and economic factors, including the Russian-Ukraine war, instability in Iran, and economic challenges surrounding Pakistan.


Firstly, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has highlighted the significance of alternative transportation routes that bypass the troubled region. The Middle Corridor provides an alternative pathway for trade and connectivity between China, Central Asia, and Europe, allowing countries to bypass the instability and potential disruptions caused by the Russian-Ukraine conflict. As a result, the Middle Corridor has gained prominence as a reliable and strategic trade route.


Secondly, Iran's instability and the heavy sanctions imposed on the country have created hurdles for international trade and investment. The Middle Corridor offers an alternative route that avoids the challenges associated with trading with Iran directly. By utilizing this corridor, countries can navigate around the economic restrictions and uncertainties related to Iran, ensuring smoother trade flows and mitigating risks.


Thirdly, Pakistan's economic challenges and regional instabilities have underlined the importance of diversifying transportation routes and strengthening connectivity options. The Middle Corridor provides an alternative path that bypasses Pakistan, reducing dependence on its infrastructure and addressing concerns related to security and political stability. This diversification helps ensure more stable and secure trade linkages within the BRI network.


By leveraging the Middle Corridor, countries can mitigate geopolitical risks, diversify trade routes, and strengthen economic cooperation. This corridor not only offers a viable alternative to troubled regions but also promotes regional integration, fosters economic development, and enhances connectivity between Asia and Europe. As a result, the Middle Corridor has gained importance within the BRI as a vital pathway that supports regional stability, trade facilitation, and the overall objectives of the initiative.


General economic trends and figures support the growing importance of the Middle Corridor within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

  1. Trade Volumes: The Middle Corridor has witnessed a significant increase in trade volumes between China, Central Asia, and Europe. For instance, in 2019, the total trade between China and Central Asian countries reached around $32 billion, showcasing the growing economic ties facilitated by this corridor.

  2. Infrastructure Investment: The Middle Corridor has been attracting substantial infrastructure investments. For instance, the construction of the China-Kazakhstan Horgos International Border Cooperation Center and the Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Iran Railway has enhanced connectivity and trade flows in the region. These investments indicate the economic significance and potential of the Middle Corridor.

  3. Energy Cooperation: Energy infrastructure development is a crucial component of the BRI and the Middle Corridor. The region has seen increased collaboration in energy projects, such as natural gas pipelines and renewable energy initiatives. These projects contribute to energy security, economic development, and regional integration.

  4. Logistics and Transport: Improved logistics and transportation networks within the Middle Corridor have bolstered trade efficiency and connectivity. For example, the China-Europe Railway routes, passing through Central Asia, have gained popularity as an alternative to traditional sea routes, significantly reducing transportation time for goods between China and Europe.

  5. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): The Middle Corridor has attracted foreign direct investment from various countries, further indicating its economic significance. Investments in sectors such as infrastructure, manufacturing, and energy contribute to economic growth and regional integration.



HOW DOES THE RISE IN IMPORTANCE OF THE MIDDLE CORRIDOR AFFECT THE GEOPOLITICAL RELATIONS IN THE REGION? The rise of the Middle Corridor within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) can have varying impacts on the relations between China and several countries, including Pakistan, Iran, Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Ukraine, and the European Union (EU). Here are some potential effects:


China and Pakistan: The Middle Corridor can strengthen the already close economic and strategic ties between China and Pakistan. It offers opportunities for enhanced trade connectivity, infrastructure development, and economic cooperation, further solidifying their bilateral relations. Yet since Pakistan's importance in the middle corridor is negligible compared to the southern corridor, Pakistan would actively seek to woo China back to its camp.


China and Iran: The Middle Corridor provides an alternative route that allows China to maintain economic engagement with Iran despite international sanctions. It can contribute to strengthening economic ties and energy cooperation between China and Iran, supporting their long-standing partnership. Yet the bypass of Iran could sour the relations between the two allies. The integration of Iran's hydrocarbon resources into the middle corridor. Another aspect of the middle corridor is its reliance on Azerbaijan and Turkey, two of Iran's biggest enemies due to the separatist Azeri movement in Iran.


China and Russia: The Middle Corridor, bypassing Russia, could lead to mixed effects on China-Russia relations. While it may create some economic competition in the Eurasian region, China and Russia also have a strong partnership in other areas, such as energy cooperation and political alignment, which could mitigate any potential negative impacts.


China and Turkey: The Middle Corridor can enhance economic cooperation between China and Turkey, providing new trade opportunities and infrastructure development projects. However, it's worth noting that geopolitical dynamics and regional considerations may also influence the overall relationship between the two countries. Turkey being a strong NATO Ally while also sitting on the important Bosphorus straits will become an important geopolitical player in the years to come.


Azerbaijan and Armenia: The Middle Corridor, passing through the region, will lead to even more issues between the two neighbours. While the Middle Corridor promises to bring widespread prosperity to Azerbaijan due to its indispensable role in the corridor, Armenia may feel left behind. This will only further exacerbate the growing disparity in the wealth and arms between the two nations, further threatening the existence of Armenia in the wake of the Turkish and Azeri rise in the region in the absence of strong support from Russia and Iran.


Russia and Georgia: The Middle Corridor, bypassing Georgia, may impact the already strained relations between Russia and Georgia. As the corridor develops, it could potentially lead to geopolitical implications and influence the dynamics between the two countries.


Russia and Ukraine: The Middle Corridor gains significance as it offers an alternative transportation route that bypasses the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It can potentially contribute to reducing dependence on Russian-controlled routes and mitigate geopolitical tensions in the region.


China and the EU: The Middle Corridor has the potential to enhance trade connectivity between China and the EU, promoting economic cooperation and opening new markets. However, geopolitical considerations, regulatory challenges, and differing priorities within the EU can also influence the overall relationship between China and the EU. It may also lead to cracks in the EU with blocks dividing into pro-China and Anti-China camps.


It's important to note that the impacts on bilateral relations can be complex and multifaceted, influenced by various factors such as geopolitical considerations, economic interests, regional dynamics, and political alignments. The actual outcomes will depend on the specific circumstances, actions taken by the involved countries, and their willingness to leverage the opportunities presented by the Middle Corridor.


WHICH COUNTRIES STAND TO GAIN THE MOST FROM THE MIDDLE CORRIDOR AND WHO WOULD BECOME THE LOSERS IN THIS SCENARIO?



The rise in the importance of the Middle Corridor within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) can bring various benefits to certain countries while posing potential challenges to others.

Countries that stand to gain:


  1. China: As the initiator of the BRI and the primary driver of the Middle Corridor, China stands to benefit from enhanced trade connectivity, access to new markets, and increased influence in the Eurasian region.

  2. Pakistan: The Middle Corridor can strengthen Pakistan's position as a crucial transit hub and trade gateway between China, Central Asia, and beyond. It can lead to improved infrastructure development, increased investment, and economic growth in the country.

  3. Central Asian countries: Countries such as Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan can benefit from improved connectivity, infrastructure investments, and increased trade flows along the Middle Corridor. These countries have the potential to become important transit and logistics hubs in the region.

  4. Turkey: Given its strategic location, Turkey can leverage the Middle Corridor to enhance its role as a regional transportation hub, facilitating trade flows between China, Central Asia, and Europe. It can benefit from increased trade, investment, and infrastructure projects.


Countries that may face challenges:

  1. Russia: The rise of the Middle Corridor could potentially pose challenges for Russia, particularly in terms of competition for transit routes, trade diversion, and potential shifts in regional dynamics. However, Russia also has the opportunity to engage in economic cooperation and leverage its existing infrastructure networks to benefit from the development of the Middle Corridor.

  2. Iran: While the Middle Corridor offers alternative trade routes for Iran, it may also pose challenges due to potential competition with Iranian ports and infrastructure projects. However, Iran can still benefit from increased connectivity and economic integration if it can leverage its strategic location and engage in cooperation within the BRI framework.

  3. Countries dependent on existing trade routes or feel stifled by the rapid growth of China: Countries heavily reliant on existing trade routes that could be bypassed by the Middle Corridor, such as some landlocked nations or those with existing infrastructure investments, may face challenges in adapting to potential shifts in trade flows and economic dynamics. Others such as India, Japan, the US, South Korea, Taiwan and Saudi Arabia may feel the heat as the rise of China as a global economic and military superpower may upend the dynamics of the region where these countries may lose out.


CONCLUSION In conclusion, the rise in the importance of the Middle Corridor within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) holds significant implications for various countries and regions. The Middle Corridor has emerged as a strategic trade route that offers alternative pathways, bypassing regions affected by conflicts, sanctions, or instability. It presents opportunities for enhanced connectivity, infrastructure development, and economic cooperation, with the potential to reshape regional dynamics and promote shared prosperity.



2 Comments


Anurag Malhotra
May 18, 2023

Very well researched and nicely compiled blog. Keep it up!

Like
Manan Sethi
Manan Sethi
May 18, 2023
Replying to

Thankss!

Like
bottom of page